Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: adobe PREMIERE PRO

  1. #11
    Inactive Member eddie123456789's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 30th, 2002
    Posts
    152
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    hi there
    Ive used Premier and Final Cut Pro.
    I still use both - I find each one is good for different things, but I mostly use Final Cut Pro.
    Im not very interested in codecs, and project settings and so on. FCP seems to deal with this stuff for you much more than Premier.
    Also I like the different resolution rendering option in FCP, which means you can view something much more quickly, to see if it works.
    I generally find FCP much quicker to render and to play back than Premier.(on my systems- Ive run Premier and FCP on the same MAC and FCP is actually FUn to use, Premier was shit. However Ive also run Premier on a PC which worked fine)
    FCP deals with render files in a much neater way than Premier - It locks the renderfiles to the clip, rather than the timeline - which premier appears to do. So if you move a clip in premier you lose the rendering, whereas in FCP, it retains the rendering.
    I think Premiers bluescreening and compositing functions are nicer to use than FCP's, and Premier seems to have absolutley every filter I can and cant think of, FCP doesnt have as many, and are not as intuitive to use as Premiers - although you can get some suprising results with FCP.
    I think I prefer Premiers audio editing bits and bobs as well, but havent done an awful lot of audio editing on fcp.

    Each has Pros and Cons - but the majority of my personal editing is done using FCP, purely because with the setups that I have, I find it runs 100% better, and is actually fun to use. I find Premier quite slow and ponderous to use.

    This is not a PC vs MAC debate - I couldnt care less what anyones elses preferences are. THese are simply my experiences.

    Good luck

  2. #12
    Inactive Member Tasty Fish Lips's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 6th, 2004
    Posts
    184
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Just wondering, were you using the latest version of Premiere, or an older one?

  3. #13
    Inactive Member eddie123456789's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 30th, 2002
    Posts
    152
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Thats using
    Premier 5.1
    and
    Final Cut Pro version 2. something

    cheers

  4. #14
    Inactive Member Tasty Fish Lips's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 6th, 2004
    Posts
    184
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I never used the earlier Premiere programs. But apparently there have been major improvments.

    Here's an in-depth review of Premiere Pro.

    http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/2...premprorev.htm

  5. #15
    Inactive Member richard.fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2004
    Posts
    181
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by eddie123456789:
    if you move a clip in premier you lose the rendering
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">While this certainly used to be the (very annoying) case with earlier versions of premiere, the pro versions make use of hardware advancements, and do a partial render the clip in real-time, so there is no requirement to render it prior to previewing. The full render is only donewhen theclip is exported. This speeds up editing greatly.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •